# Adaptation #1: Much more careful scaffolding (UPDATED)

Today, I’d like to begin a series of blog posts called “adaptations”–these posts will try to capture some of the things that I have to do (or that I will do) differently because of my new environment and/or clientele.

Adaptation #1: I have to be much more deliberate and prescribed at setting the stage for to students to successfully complete a task.

At my college, I routinely assign tasks that are ambiguous, require multiple steps, or require collaboration to my students. They are an amazing bunch and usually complete these kinds of tasks with no problems. I tell them what I want, why I want it, give them the necessary content knowledge to do the task, but usually I don’t have to tell them much about how they are to go about doing it. I knew that I couldn’t do the same thing at high school, but I didn’t realize the degree of scaffolding that is required for teaching high school students. I still probably don’t fully understand yet.

Here’s an example. This morning, in my third period Algebra 1 class (which is now stuffed with students, many of the faces being new) we spent most of the period working on a task from the CPM Algebra 1 textbook involving naming points on the coordinate plane. The task is built around a moderately elaborate story problem about a farm and trees. The trees are arranged in a grid and students are asked to refer to specific trees using (x,y) coordinate notation. Before the activity, I reviewed some terminology relating to the coordinate plane (x-axis, origin, coordinates, etc) and we did a few examples of naming and locating points on the plane.

Students also frequently answered “Yes” when I asked them if they had read the instructions, even though it was clear through their questions that they had not read the instructions. I’m not sure if it’s because they don’t know how to read something carefully or if it’s that they are looking for me to just tell them what to do.

I think what I should have done was to explain, before handing out the task, that there would be instructions and that the instructions should be read carefully before doing the problems. Perhaps I should have asked a student to read the instructions aloud so that students with reading difficulties could at least hear it once. Perhaps I should have demonstrated what careful reading looks like (underlining important words or phrases, rereading a sentence until it makes sense, referring to a figure or diagram when it’s mentioned in a sentence).

If I remember to do this in my next class, I’ll try to report if that made a difference.

UPDATE: During the next class period, I modeled to the class how I expect them to read instructions. I emphasized that reading something mathematical is different than reading a Harry Potter book. It seemed to work as the students seemed to be much more successful on the task this time. I still had some students who were not on task and wanted me to just tell him what to do, but I was firm and made them read the handout to figure out what they needed to do.

## 2 thoughts on “Adaptation #1: Much more careful scaffolding (UPDATED)”

1. Sorry it has taken me so long, but I’ve finally figured out where the blog is 😛

So I guess, the point is I know the pain and this is something that I even struggle with when working with undergrad math students, especially engineering math students who really have no idea why we made them pay \$150 for a copy of Adams or Anton Calculus!

2. […] observations of things we don’t always notice — or that we’ve forgotten (example here). So go back through the archives and drink up! Adventures in […]